• Listenly
  • Public Library
  • John Marshall
  • Opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States, at January Term, 1832, Delivered by Mr. Chief Justice Marshall in the Case of Samuel A. Worcester, Plaintiff in Error, versus the State of Georgia With a Statement of the Case, Extracted from the Records of the Supreme Court of the United States
Opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States, at January Term, 1832, Delivered by Mr. Chief Justice Marshall in the Case of Samuel A. Worcester, Plaintiff in Error, versus the State of Georgia With a Statement of the Case, Extracted from the Records of the Supreme Court of the United States

audiobook

Opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States, at January Term, 1832, Delivered by Mr. Chief Justice Marshall in the Case of Samuel A. Worcester, Plaintiff in Error, versus the State of Georgia With a Statement of the Case, Extracted from the Records of the Supreme Court of the United States

by John Marshall

EN·~1 hours·3 chapters

Chapters

3 total
1

OPINION - OF THE - SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, - AT JANUARY TERM, 1832, - DELIVERED BY MR. CHIEF JUSTICE MARSHALL. - IN THE CASE OF - SAMUEL A. WORCESTER, Plaintiff in Error, - versus - THE STATE OF GEORGIA - With a statement of the case, extracted from the Records of the Supreme Court of the United States.

1:19:47
2

PRINTED FROM AUTHENTICATED COPIES.

0:02
3

WASHINGTON: PRINTED BY GALES AND SEATON. 1852.

0:02

Description

In January 1832 the nation’s highest court convened to hear a dispute that still echoes in today’s discussions of sovereignty and federal authority. Chief Justice John Marshall presides over the case of Samuel Worcester, a settler accused by Georgia of living within Cherokee territory without a state licence. The record opens with a meticulous chain of official documents—writs, citations, and a detailed indictment—that reveal the tension between state law and the rights claimed by the Cherokee Nation.

The heart of the hearing revolves around a fundamental question: can a state prosecute a person for actions that occurred on lands governed by a separate, sovereign nation? As Worcester argues that the alleged offenses happened inside Cherokee jurisdiction, the court must untangle layers of early American legal doctrine, territorial boundaries, and the obligations of citizenship. Listeners will hear the precise language of 19th‑century legal proceedings and gain insight into the foundational debates that shaped the United States’ approach to Native American relations.

Collections

Browse all

Details

Full title

Opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States, at January Term, 1832, Delivered by Mr. Chief Justice Marshall in the Case of Samuel A. Worcester, Plaintiff in Error, versus the State of Georgia With a Statement of the Case, Extracted from the Records of the Supreme Court of the United States With a Statement of the Case, Extracted from the Records of the Supreme Court of the United States

Language

en

Duration

~1 hours (76K characters)

Publisher of text edition

Project Gutenberg

Release date

2009-07-26

Rights

Public domain in the USA.

About the author

John Marshall

John Marshall

1755–1835

A Revolutionary War veteran who became America’s fourth chief justice, he helped define the role of the Supreme Court in the early republic. His decisions shaped constitutional law and gave the Court lasting authority in the U.S. system of government.

View all books

You may also like