
In the wake of France’s turbulent political reshaping, the author steps into the public debate over how the nation’s representatives should be chosen. He argues that universal suffrage, though imperfectly used for over two decades, remains essential because it has become a deeply rooted habit, enjoys popular support, and reflects a basic sense of fairness: every citizen, whether farmer, worker, or bourgeois, should have a say over decisions that affect their lives and property.
From this premise, the essay urges a sincere reform of the voting process. Rather than offering a token ballot that merely slides into a box, the law should provide a genuine expression of will, tailored to the education and experience of the average Frenchman of 1871. The author dismisses the idea of list voting as a gimmick that forces voters to pick strangers at random, insisting that any new system must respect the voter’s intelligence and promote honest participation.
Language
fr
Duration
~56 minutes (54K characters)
Publisher of text edition
Project Gutenberg
Credits
Produced by Carlo Traverso and the Distributed Proofreading team at DP-test Italia. (This file was produced from images generously made available by The Internet Archive/Canadian Libraries)
Release date
2019-12-02
Rights
Public domain in the USA.

1828–1893
A sharp-eyed French critic and historian, he brought science, psychology, and social history into literary study in a way that changed how many readers thought about books and culture. Best known for his forceful ideas about how character and environment shape human behavior, he was one of the major intellectual figures of 19th-century France.
View all books