
A witty, thought‑provoking essay collection that examines the long‑standing rivalry between French and English literary traditions. The author opens with a vivid anecdote about Ingres’s monumental “Apotheosis of Homer,” noting how Shakespeare was barely a footnote on its canvas, and then flips the question: how would a British painter treat Racine? From there, the book launches into a lively dialogue about national taste, cultural pride, and the ways critics on each side of the Channel have celebrated—or dismissed—their own and each other’s great dramatists.
Through a series of reprinted papers and fresh commentary, the work explores how scholars like John Bailey and M. Lemaître argue fiercely yet never truly engage with one another’s perspectives. It reveals the paradox of mutual admiration mixed with stubborn prejudice, inviting listeners to reconsider what makes a writer “great” and how geography shapes our literary judgments. The tone is erudite yet accessible, perfect for anyone curious about the cultural crossroads of Racine, Shakespeare, and the broader canon.
Language
en
Duration
~7 hours (455K characters)
Publisher of text edition
Project Gutenberg
Credits
Produced by Jonathan Ingram, Wilelmina Mallière and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team.
Release date
2004-05-01
Rights
Public domain in the USA.

1880–1932
A sharp, witty English biographer and critic, he helped change how modern biography was written. Best known for Eminent Victorians and Queen Victoria, he brought skepticism, style, and psychological insight to subjects earlier writers treated with reverence.
View all books